From: Harry Zinser [mailto:zinsers@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2012 1:19 PM
To: Valin Miranker
Cc: Harry Zinser; Anita Oliveri
Subject: LSV
Valin: Congratulations for having attained that great positon of being on the LSV board. Are you having fun yet? My wife and I own Unit 85. I try to keep in touch with going ons through Anita.
The latest round of voting has me a bit puzzled and I am not sure I understand the math (really the thinking) that ended up with a one time assessment for a 300 K loan.
Also, why does that assessment have to paid by May? or whatever date was. Did anyone on board consider that some owners may not have retired with a spike in their last year's pay or a golden handshake? I find that decision rather presumptuous.
Also, that decision totally discounts the votes of 19 people who voted no. When ever you change the conditions you are voting on, then shouldn't that be put to a new vote? It seems that some board members are in a haste to get certain conditions fixed. The problem is: Just because there was no majority vote on the first set of conditions, I don't think is right for the board to have discounted all votes that were not for option A or B, and then, as a board, decide what to do.
I AM WILLING TO GO ALONG WITH WHAT EVER THE HOME OWNERS DECIDE AS A MAJORITY. BUT IT IS WRONG FOR THE BOARD TO SAY WE DO NOT HAVE A MAJORITY VOTE, THEREFORE WE WILL DO THIS. NO. THEN THE NEW SET OF CONDITIONS NEEDS TO BE PUT OUT AND A NEW VOTE TAKEN.
Any light you can shed, or feel free about discussing, would be greatly appreciated.
Harry Zinser: Unit 85
No comments:
Post a Comment